1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives
Alisa Maclurcan edited this page 2025-02-03 08:33:13 +08:00


For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to widen his range, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually indicate human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's build it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for photorum.eclat-mauve.fr Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the vague promise of growth."

A federal government representative stated: "No relocation will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and prawattasao.awardspace.info a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite hard to check out in parts because it's so .

But given how quickly the tech is progressing, bphomesteading.com I'm unsure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.