1 As DeepSeek Upends the aI Industry, one Group is Urging Australia to Embrace The Opportunity
Ahmad Stockman edited this page 2025-02-03 19:16:41 +08:00


One Australian business has actually prevented staff from using the innovation, others are scrambling for guidance on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are urging caution.

But others have actually invited DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in establishing effective yet less energy-intensive AI innovation.

In the days considering that the Chinese business released its R1 synthetic intelligence design and openly released its chatbot and app, it has actually overthrown the AI market.

- Register for surgiteams.com Guardian Australia's breaking news email

Several global industry leaders saw their market worths drop after the launch, macphersonwiki.mywikis.wiki as DeepSeek revealed AI could be established using a portion of the expense and processing needed to train designs such as ChatGPT or .

Its arrival might signal a new industry shift, however for federal government and organization, the impact is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival captured governments and businesses by surprise as staff began to try out the brand-new AI technology, at least for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.

Business as typical

A spokesperson for Telstra said the company had "an extensive process to examine all AI tools, abilities, and utilize cases in our company", including a list of authorized generative AI tools, and guidelines on how to utilize them.

In the meantime at Telstra, DeepSeek is not authorized and its use is not encouraged (although it's not officially obstructed).

"Our favored partner is MS Copilot, and we're presenting 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our workers."

Other business looked for instant recommendations on whether DeepSeek should be embraced.

Major Australian cybersecurity firm CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, stated clients had currently approached the business for recommendations on whether the innovation was safe.

"That's not a surprise, because it appears the whole world has been in a bit of a DeepSeek frenzy - both the economically and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and government

CyberCX today took the unusual action of quickly releasing advice advising organisations, including government departments and those saving delicate information, highly think about restricting access to DeepSeek on work devices.

"We understand that there is no proactive policy here from government ... We've been down this roadway in the past," Mansted said. "We have actually had disputes about TikTok, about Chinese monitoring cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we always act after the fact, not before the fact ... Here, particularly since the risks are around compromise of sensitive details, in regards to any info that you take into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.

"We thought we needed to act much faster this time."

Under federal AI policy implemented in September 2024, agencies have up until completion of February 2025 to publish openness files about their use of AI.

But understanding who makes choices on the particular use of DeepSeek in the federal government has proved tricky. The attorney general's department, which made the choice to prohibit TikTok use on government gadgets, referred questions to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its official policy and did not offer a reaction by the time of publication.

Familiar arguments ...

A few of the reaction in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have been calls to prohibit the innovation, amid concern over how the Chinese federal government might access user data - an echo of the days Huawei was banned from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more recently, of the dispute over banning TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, stated today that Australia "can not continue the existing technique of reacting to each new tech advancement". It required a tech technique covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI capabilities.

The industry minister, Ed Husic, stated on Tuesday it was prematurely to make a decision on whether DeepSeek was a security threat.

Register to Breaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

"If there is anything that presents a threat in the national interest, we will constantly keep an open mind and watch what occurs. I believe it's too early to leap to conclusions on that," he stated. "But, once again, if we need to act, then accountable governments do."

He stressed that Australia is "in the last phases" of preparing its response and would develop its own regulative settings.

"The US is flagging their method. The EU has theirs. Canada also will have a various approach. And our regional partners also are looking at this," he stated.